Stephanie Cutter adds some actual facts to the discussion on repealing Health Care reform.
To summarize the facts:
Currently, American families are paying an extra $1,000 per year to compensate health care providers for costs associated with the uninsured.
The new law requires that 80% of health care dollars have to actually go to health care as opposed to, say, PR, advertising and the hiring of lobbyists.
The new law requires insurance companies to justify premium hikes. These consumer protections will also lower consumer costs.
By lowering premiums, the burdon on businesses providing insurance to their employees is lowered, leaving those revenues available for capital improvements, employee raises and new-hires.
If premium costs are not brought under control, 2.5M – 4M jobs will be lost according to Harvard economists
So why are Republicans pushing their false claims about Health Care Reform? The LA Times exposes the source:
What about Republican assertions that studies show hundreds of thousands of jobs at risk?
They are quite misleading. As outlined by the nonpartisan Factcheck.org, one study by the conservative National Federation of Independent Business that an estimated 1.6 million jobs would be lost did not analyze the new law. Instead, it examined an alternative that did not exempt small businesses from the mandate.
That's right, the numbers Republicans are quoting have nothing to do with the actual law.
Oh, and who is the National Federation of Independent Business? According to Wikipedia:
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) is a lobbying organization with offices in Washington, D.C. USA, and in all 50 state capitals.
There you have it. The whole Republican argument is based on a dishonest report prepared by lobbyists.
Major health insurance companies in California and other states have decided to stop selling policies for children rather than comply with a new federal healthcare law that bars them from rejecting youngsters with preexisting medical conditions.
Anthem Blue Cross, Aetna Inc. and others will halt new child-only policies in California, Illinois, Florida, Connecticut and elsewhere as early as Thursday when provisions of the nation's new healthcare law take effect, including a requirement that insurers cover children under age 19 regardless of their health histories.
Hi, I’m Gina Cooper, the Political Outsider. Today I’m talking about the governing philosophies of incrementalism and do-nothing-ism, and how those methods are inadequate for addressing today’s big challenges.
“Health Premiums up 131% in Last 10 Years.” That’s what the San Francisco Chronicle headline read last September
when the average family premium for employer based health insurance officially crossed the $13,000 mark. 5 months later, Anthem Blue Cross announced that they would be raising their premiums, as much as 39% in California, even though it’s parent company, Wellstone, reported a profit of $2.7B last year.
It doesn’t take an expert in Health Care Policy to figure out that the American public is being fleeced, that these costs are unsustainable, and that citizens need something bigger than themselves to fight back.
Do you know why COBRA, the law that lets people keep their health insurance when they leave their jobs, is called COBRA?
"The correct name is continuation benefits. And the only reason it's called COBRA is because it was contained in the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985; and that is how we came up with the name COBRA,"
According to NPR health care reform via the reconciliation process has a deep history, going back to 1882. Here's a list of health care reform legislation passed via reconciliation:
As someone with lots of opinions, I've done my share of criticizing President Obama.
My criticism of Obama has to do with how, until recently, he spent more time courting Capitol Hill than maintaining the momentum of his movement. I'm thrilled to see him becoming more involved with the people again. After all, it wasn't his ability to manipulate congress that scared the hell out of the Washington establishment a year ago. It was the masses of people who were standing behind him. That is his strength, his power.
That's also the one tool he has for moving elected leaders whose main goals are to get reelected - scare the hell out of them with their own people demanding something different. In the end, only our votes can compete with the other interests influencing every politician's move. They system rewards members on Capitol Hill who make funding their next reelection bid a priority.
If people want to be mad at something, be mad at a Senate that is so beholden to lobbyists and their money, that the members are incapable of looking beyond their own self interest - winning the next election - to work for something that is good for the people they represent.
The Senate and its leadership need to take responsibility for their own inability to move. They are the immobile bureaucracy too ossified to either fall in line or think anew. It's their job to find a way to pass legislation. President Obama's leadership is not the issue here.
The challenges of change are always hard. It is important that we begin to unpack those challenges that confront this nation and realize that we each have a role that requires us to change and become more responsible for shaping our own future. -Hillary Clinton
